🔗 Share this article

Mainstream political parties are increasingly enabling the far right to set the public discourse, according to a new research conducted in Germany.

Academics found that this phenomenon has inadvertently helped far-right parties by validating their ideas and spreading them to a broader audience.

Study Based on Two Decades of News Reporting

The results, published in the European Journal of Political Research, utilized an computerized content review of more than 520,000 news pieces from a half-dozen national publications.

Berlin-based researchers noted that as the radical faction shifted from marginal topics in the 1990s era to core subjects like integration and immigration, established parties progressively adjusted their messaging in response.

This adjustment boosted the spread of these concepts and indicated to the electorate that such positions were acceptable.

Implications for Democratic Systems

"Public discourse by mainstream political groups is crucial in the electoral success of the radical right," stated a expert in political behavior participating in the study.

"This element has been underestimated," she added.

The effect was noticeable even when conventional parties were condemning the radical faction. "You're still giving them attention," the expert commented. "Our core argument is that because we live in such a struggle for visibility, this focus is crucial."

Mainstreaming Phenomenon Across Europe

While the research was centered around Germany, this mainstreaming phenomenon is probable to affect nations throughout Europe.

"You see this a lot in European media," explained another researcher. "Radical groups makes a statement and everybody starts talking about it for several days."

"Even if you're countering it, you're repeating it," he added.

Toughening of Public Rhetoric

At certain points, political figures have also hardened their language to match that of the far right.

In a recently published interview, a then national leader advocated large-scale deportations and urged them to happen "more frequently and rapidly."

Similar examples can be found across Europe, as elected officials from nations ranging from the UK to France adopt the language of the radical right, especially on immigration.

This has created an feedback loop that would have been inconceivable a ten years prior.

Central Issue: Who Dictates the Narrative?

"{If you're a centrist political group and you are discussing societal topics – migration, integration – in a way that is determined by the rhythm of the radical right, that's the whole idea of agenda setting," clarified a researcher.

Other parties have taken additional measures, attempting to emulate the hardline agenda of the radical right, even as research indicates that this approach drives the electorate to cast their ballot for the far right.

Progressive Influence and Public Perception

The scope of data gathered showed that the influence of radical groups had been gradual and had grown with the passage of time.

"Voter awareness doesn't change from one day to another," stated a researcher. "However, when you hear this pessimistic narrative around immigration frequently, and it is being disseminated not only by far-right parties but also, for instance, by mainstream political organizations, then of course this narrative gains more traction."

Need for Established Groups to Develop Their Own Discourses

The study emphasized the need for established political parties to develop their own narratives, particularly on subjects such as immigration and assimilation, instead of continuously following the far right.

"It's like a dance," explained one author. "If the conductor is radical and you're reacting to it, you lose the ability to choose which music should be playing."